Cipro - Jury Verdicts

______ RECOVERY @INTRO = Medical malpractice - Failure to timely diagnose and treat subacute bacterial endocarditis - Permanent damage to aortic valve requiring open heart surgery, mechanical valve replacement, and lifelong need for anticoagulation medicine.
@INTRO = The plaintiff, age 54, presented to the defendant physician assistant (PA) with a two week history of upper respiratory infection, sinus congestion and cough. The plaintiff was examined by defendant PA, who diagnosed upper respiratory infection and ordered Cipro. The plaintiff contended that the defendant PA, defendant internist and supervising defendant PA were negligent. Th...
- from The New England Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (47558) Login for Cipro Verdict
______ RECOVERY Medical malpractice - Failure to timely diagnose and treat subacute bacterial endocarditis - Permanent damage to aortic valve requiring open heart surgery, mechanical valve replacement, and lifelong need for anticoagulation medicine.
The plaintiff, age 54, presented to the defendant physician assistant (PA) with a two week history of upper respiratory infection, sinus congestion and cough. The plaintiff was examined by defendant PA, who diagnosed upper respiratory infection and ordered Cipro. The plaintiff contended that the defendant PA, defendant internist and supervising defendant PA were negligent. The plaintiff further c...
- from The National Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (50388) Login for Cipro Verdict
______ VERDICT - MEDICAL MALPRACTICE - ALLEGED FAILURE TO TIMELY DIAGNOSE AND TREAT SHOULDER ABSCESS - STAPH INFECTION - WRONGFUL DEATH AT AGE 72.
This was a wrongful death/medical malpractice action, in which the plaintiff claimed that the two defendant physicians, a primary care physician (attending physician) and an infectious disease specialist, negligently failed to diagnose and treat a shoulder abscess, leading to the decedent's death. The defendants maintained that the plaintiff's shoulder abscess developed later than claimed by the ...
- from The Florida Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (64508) Login for Cipro Verdict
______ RECOVERY Negligent failure to perform proper diagnostic testing - Failure to timely detect and treat septic arthritis in knee - Need for knee replacement sooner than otherwise would have been required.
This was an action brought by the female plaintiff, age 53 at the time in question, against her treating orthopedic surgeon alleging that the defendant negligently failed to timely diagnose and treat a knee infection which developed postoperatively. As a result, the plaintiff requires a total knee replacement in the near future.

The plaintiff was prepared to offer evide...
- from The National Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (11748) Login for Cipro Verdict
______ VERDICT Alleged improper treatment for post-operative infection - Amputation of great toe.
The plaintiff, a female in her mid-20's contended that the defendant podiatric surgeon, improperly treated her for a post- operative infection. As a result, the plaintiff alleged that amputation of her great toe was required four months post- surgery. The defendant maintained that the care rendered to the plaintiff was appropriate and that the amputation was necessitated by the p...
- from The Pennsylvania Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (35203) Login for Cipro Verdict
______ VERDICT Alleged medical malpractice - Failure to provide adequate antibiotic coverage following surgery - Infection - Knee fusion required.
The plaintiff, a female in her 70's, contended that the defendant orthopedic surgeon failed to provide adequate antibiotic coverage following surgery, resulting in an infection which led to the necessity of a knee fusion. The defendant maintained that the antibiotics prescribed were appropriate.

The plaintiff underwent a total knee replacement performed by the defendant or...
- from The Pennsylvania Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (35793) Login for Cipro Verdict
______ RECOVERY - MEDICAL MALPRACTICE - DELAY IN SURGERY TO REMOVE BOWEL OBSTRUCTION - FAILURE TO TIMELY DIAGNOSE AND TREAT POST-OPERATIVE INFECTION - FAILURE TO ORDER APPROPRIATE ANTIBIOTICS - FAILURE TO OBTAIN TIMELY CONSULTATION - WRONGFUL DEATH OF 34-YEAR-OLD MOTHER OF TWO.
This action stemmed from the death of the 34-year-old decedent from the complications of infection following surgery to remove a bowel obstruction. The hospital where the decedent was treated settled prior to suit being filed and the only defendant against whom suit was filed was the surgeon who operated on the decedent.

The plaintiff claimed that the defendant surgeon failed...
- from The Florida Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (27790) Login for Cipro Verdict
______ VERDICT Alleged negligent failure to timely refer plaintiff to infectious diseases specialist to treat post-operative knee infection - Osteomyelitis.
The male plaintiff, age 31 at the time of the events in question, contended that he received substandard post-operative care at the hands of the defendant orthopedic surgeon, who performed ACL reconstructive surgery on the plaintiff's previously injured knee. The plaintiff contended that the defendant negligently failed to provide adequate antibiotic treatment for a post-op inf...
- from The National Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (6495) Login for Cipro Verdict
______ VERDICT - MEDICAL MALPRACTICE - ORTHOPEDIC MEDICINE - ALLEGED NEGLIGENT FAILURE TO TIMELY REFER PLAINTIFF TO INFECTIOUS DISEASES SPECIALIST TO TREAT POST-OPERATIVE KNEE INFECTION.
The male plaintiff, age 31 at the time of the events in question, contended that he received substandard post-operative care at the hands of the defendant orthopedic surgeon, who performed ACL reconstructive surgery on the plaintiff's previously injured knee. The plaintiff contended that the defendant negligently failed to provide adequate antibiotic treatment for the infection ...
- from The New England Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (30491) Login for Cipro Verdict
______ VERDICT Alleged failure to properly treat nail wound to diabetic - Transmetatarsal amputation of right foot.
This action was brought against two individual family practitioners and their professional association. The plaintiff alleged that the defendants failed to properly treat a nail wound to his foot, leading to infection which resulted in transmetatarsal amputation of the right foot. The defendants argued that the wound was properly treated and that the plaintiff's amputation was ...
- from The Florida Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (265) Login for Cipro Verdict

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Need A Cipro Attorney?

First Name Last Name Email Address State
Have You Suffered a Tendon Injury?

Please describe your injury
Click to Ask a Question

Your Friend's Email Address

Your Email Address

Type a Message (optional)


Need A Cipro Lawyer?

First Name Last Name Email Address State
Have You Suffered a Tendon Injury?

Please describe your injury
Click to Ask a Question

 

Close (x)

Looking for an Attorney?


Please type your question:

Close (x)

logo Find Legal Help for Your Cipro Case - Submit Your Information Below

Do you need legal assistance with your Cipro case?
LegalView may be able to help.


Submit your information below for a free, no-cost evaluation.

We'll submit your information to one of our partner firms.
LegalView's partners represent clients throughout the United States, for a very wide range of legal issues. Submit your information now, to see if one of LegalView's partners can help!

* Indicates Required Fields

First name *
Last name *
Email Address *
Phone Number *
()  -

State *
Legal Issue * Unsafe Drugs: Cipro Change
Was There an Injury?
Please Describe The Injury

DISCLAIMER and STATEMENT OF NON-CONFIDENTIALITY

By submitting this form, you agree that completing the above is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship.

Disclosure

Legal WebTV Network LLC, LegalView.com, and LegalWebMedia.com are group advertising sponsored by the attorneys identified here. It is not a lawyer referral service. If you submit information on this website [more...]

Legal WebTV Network LLC, LegalView.com, and LegalWebMedia.com are group advertising sponsored by the attorneys identified here. It is not a lawyer referral service. If you submit information on this website, LegalWebMedia.com will submit your information to the law firms that pay for this group advertising and to respond to your requests for information concerning legal services in their assigned local areas. If there is no sponsoring firm in your state, your inquiry will be submitted to one of the sponsoring law firms on a predetermined, rotating basis. If the sponsoring law firm accepts your case, it will associate with licensed attorneys practicing in your state, if required; the sponsoring law firm may also contact other law firms to see if they may be able to assist.

The information provided by the LegalView.com and LegalWebMedia.com websites is for advertising and informational purposes and should not be considered as legal advice from the sponsoring attorneys. The websites contain general information and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts, or settlements. LegalView.com contains information created by others or supplied through open forums; the sponsoring law firms are not responsible for the accuracy of this information. Any person viewing or receiving information from these websites should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any such information without first seeking appropriate legal advice from an attorney in your area. Legal WebTV Network, LLC expressly disclaims any liability with respect to actions taken or not taken by the recipient based on any or all of the information or contents contained in these websites.

Any information sent to Legal WebTV Network LLC through this website is done using standard Web encryption techology. LegalView.com will exercise all reasonable care, within technological limits, to protect the confidentiality of any information submitted via Internet e-mail or through this website. By accessing this website, you may be seeking an attorney to represent you or legal advice. However, none of the sponsoring attorneys represent you yet.

The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements.

Any transmission of information, whether via Internet e-mail or through the website, is solely for evaluation purposes by the sponsoring law firms and their associates. The transmission of any information to any attorney sponsoring advertising on LegalView.com or LegalWebMedia.com does not create an attorney-client relationship between the sender and any recipient. An attorney-client relationship can only be created by a written, signed-fee agreement entered into with an attorney. The sponsoring attorneys will treat your information as a confidential communication for the purpose of obtaining legal services or legal advice.

For more information about the sponsoring law firms, please click here.

This form is secure and encrypted. More information about secure forms and your privacy here.