Home : Unsafe Drugs : Cipro : Jury Verdicts
Cipro - Jury Verdicts
-
@INTRO = The plaintiff, age 54, presented to the defendant physician assistant (PA) with a two week history of upper respiratory infection, sinus congestion and cough. The plaintiff was examined by defendant PA, who diagnosed upper respiratory infection and ordered Cipro. The plaintiff contended that the defendant PA, defendant internist and supervising defendant PA were negligent. Th...
- from The New England Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (47558) Login for Cipro Verdict -
The plaintiff, age 54, presented to the defendant physician assistant (PA) with a two week history of upper respiratory infection, sinus congestion and cough. The plaintiff was examined by defendant PA, who diagnosed upper respiratory infection and ordered Cipro. The plaintiff contended that the defendant PA, defendant internist and supervising defendant PA were negligent. The plaintiff further c...
- from The National Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (50388) Login for Cipro Verdict -
This was a wrongful death/medical malpractice action, in which the plaintiff claimed that the two defendant physicians, a primary care physician (attending physician) and an infectious disease specialist, negligently failed to diagnose and treat a shoulder abscess, leading to the decedent's death. The defendants maintained that the plaintiff's shoulder abscess developed later than claimed by the ...
- from The Florida Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (64508) Login for Cipro Verdict -
This was an action brought by the female plaintiff, age 53 at the time in question, against her treating orthopedic surgeon alleging that the defendant negligently failed to timely diagnose and treat a knee infection which developed postoperatively. As a result, the plaintiff requires a total knee replacement in the near future.
The plaintiff was prepared to offer evide...
- from The National Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (11748) Login for Cipro Verdict -
The plaintiff, a female in her mid-20's contended that the defendant podiatric surgeon, improperly treated her for a post- operative infection. As a result, the plaintiff alleged that amputation of her great toe was required four months post- surgery. The defendant maintained that the care rendered to the plaintiff was appropriate and that the amputation was necessitated by the p...
- from The Pennsylvania Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (35203) Login for Cipro Verdict -
The plaintiff, a female in her 70's, contended that the defendant orthopedic surgeon failed to provide adequate antibiotic coverage following surgery, resulting in an infection which led to the necessity of a knee fusion. The defendant maintained that the antibiotics prescribed were appropriate.
The plaintiff underwent a total knee replacement performed by the defendant or...
- from The Pennsylvania Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (35793) Login for Cipro Verdict -
This action stemmed from the death of the 34-year-old decedent from the complications of infection following surgery to remove a bowel obstruction. The hospital where the decedent was treated settled prior to suit being filed and the only defendant against whom suit was filed was the surgeon who operated on the decedent.
The plaintiff claimed that the defendant surgeon failed...
- from The Florida Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (27790) Login for Cipro Verdict -
The male plaintiff, age 31 at the time of the events in question, contended that he received substandard post-operative care at the hands of the defendant orthopedic surgeon, who performed ACL reconstructive surgery on the plaintiff's previously injured knee. The plaintiff contended that the defendant negligently failed to provide adequate antibiotic treatment for a post-op inf...
- from The National Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (6495) Login for Cipro Verdict -
The male plaintiff, age 31 at the time of the events in question, contended that he received substandard post-operative care at the hands of the defendant orthopedic surgeon, who performed ACL reconstructive surgery on the plaintiff's previously injured knee. The plaintiff contended that the defendant negligently failed to provide adequate antibiotic treatment for the infection ...
- from The New England Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (30491) Login for Cipro Verdict -
This action was brought against two individual family practitioners and their professional association. The plaintiff alleged that the defendants failed to properly treat a nail wound to his foot, leading to infection which resulted in transmetatarsal amputation of the right foot. The defendants argued that the wound was properly treated and that the plaintiff's amputation was ...
- from The Florida Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (265) Login for Cipro Verdict






